Mmmmmm, cream cakes.......
Did you know that the donut place in Karrinyup food court make fresh hot cinnamon donuts while you wait - 90secs !!
That was just a lil fyi.
Its all just happy endorphins ain't it though - like going to the gym ?
I spose my point is - even though you get that euphoric feeling/ adrenalin rush from bunji jumping or jumping out of a plane - you wouldn't do it without a harness.
hmm let's see, thread discussion is about addiction/mental illness, let's find the first post that starts crapping about something else...
oh, a whine about posting styles!
LOOK AT THAT SOMEWHAT DIFFERENT TO YOUR VIEW OF REALITY
Still denying reality in order to keep your air of self righteous prickery going I see
I sure hope your white knighting has at least got you a pity root or two over the years, sheesh.
Let it go now princess.
Last edited by Multivital; 30-03-2012 at 06:30 PM.
That's a good point all things considered.
However if you were ADDICTED to bungee jumping then yes you would, you'd jump with just the bungee and no safety.
That's what makes the difference between addiction to something and 'liking it a lot' - the self-endangering aspect.
no sweety. we've done this several times over on TS before.Originally Posted by Onijin
just because a black kid stole your friend's wallet this one time, does not make your prejudice against aboriginals receiving welfare actually valid.
(p.s. hai sneeza! good talk <3)
Last edited by chay; 30-03-2012 at 07:13 PM.
sumdae i be big and u be sowry
No, but it does make him more likely to look for evidence to justify this outlook, and this evidence may have validity. The fact he admits he's biased is a step in the right direction however
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
I would say it's natural. Condemn the act before the individual, and the individual definitely before their associates, but this isn't how people think. Him admitting his bias is like an addict admitting they have a problem, being the first step to recovery.
If you bag out someone every time they admit they have a problem they will be less likely to talk about the problem.
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
If we were still hunter gatherers it may have some validity, not in the west in 2012
I find it amusing how everyone has a snide, cunty remark for onijin and he never bites back.
im from canada aye
Leave Onion alone!
now now skeeter, onijin ain't hurtin' nobody
The fact that your thought processors are drawn from personal experiences is pretty god damm common, having the decency to make an admission of it is far less common, i applaud that. Furthermore, if it's indeed proven that there's a strong link between drug abuse and aggravated robbery *hint, there is* then is you opinion biased or are your perceptions perhaps justified? if so, how much so?
I had my fair share of illicit indulgence when i was younger and i kicked around with plenty of people with addiction issues including for more nasty stuff like meth and smack. Quite frankly, if i knew someone was heavily addicted to either of those drugs (or in fact any other drug, alcohol included) i'd be much more diligent around them, i don't think anyone should be ridiculed for a basic sense of self- preservation.
While i'm chucking my 5p worth in, hai burnie... i've flicked through this thread whilst on holiday and yet again you've proven how much of a cunt you really are. I don't agree with Hardcore whatever her name was but inferring that her husband will eventually beat her is complete dogshit, that's just as bad as some redneck suggesting that only koons shoplift as their lifestyles of abuse and unemployment become further entrenched.
but it's A-OK for her to infer her hubby and his mates can happily beat the shit out of nig nogs and hippies because ITS A HARD LIFE BEING A COP AMIRITE!!!
fuck off you tweaker. your high school pseudo intellectualism is painful.
EVERYONE'S PROCESSES COME FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE YOU HALFWIT
IT'S JUST THAT RACISTS/BIGOTS TRY AND JUSTIFY PEJORATIVELY APPLYING THAT TO BROAD CLASSES OF SKIN TONE/MENTAL ILLNESS
NOT SAYING THATS WHAT YOUR DOING HEY BUT YOU KNOW
Last edited by Multivital; 02-04-2012 at 02:12 PM.
You're one of very few I suspect. If you can honestly sit there and say if you were walking home at night along a quiet street by yourself and a group of 'dark skinned' men were following you, and the thought didnt even cross your mind that you may get the shit kicked out of you, then I take my hat off to thee.
But I think you are full of shit.
Reality is for people who can't handle drugs.
prejudice and self-preservation are not the same thing, you guys
self-preservation: "oh shit, there's a group of youths following me down this dark alley. i will walk a bit faster and get to a more well lit area"
prejudice: "oh shit, there's a group of youths following me down this dark alley. i will walk a bit faster because they are darkies"
sumdae i be big and u be sowry
why are you prejudiced against youth chay
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
that kind of prejudice just lets the REAL perpetrators get away scot free
i propose curfews for dark alleyways
also what's the deal with people ripping on the scots just because they like a bargain
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
For a start I personally wouldn't be walking down a dark alley and yes if any group were following me I'd be bolting.
There is prejudice of making rash assumptions, there is self-preservation.
You might call it prejudice I think Chay, but I also think there is being wary of certain types of people especially after something bad has happened to you which goes toward self preservation.
Something bad happens to you and it tends to bend your mind to think of that 'stereotype' a certain way. Not only ethnicity but people can have 'daddy issues', 'mummy issues' - is that being prejudice too ?
^ I think I may have just repeated myself but thats coz I don't have a fancy 'internet vocabulary' with which to express myself.
i think yer talking around shit
point is it's ok to avoid dodgy people (after 3am this includes just about anyone), or to be hyper-vigilant in the case of finding yourself in dangerous circumstances (after 3am this includes just about anywhere)
it's not ok to assume all black people are dodgy, because you once met a dodgy black man
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
Last edited by heist; 02-04-2012 at 03:00 PM.
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
"Matthew Giles was repeatedly punched by Constable Thomas Murdoch during a Big Bash match"
-straight face-
"Police have wrapped up their investigation into Constable Murdoch and are refusing to say whether he will face any action."
how do they have the right to refuse? national security? terrorism? inherent corruption?
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
You would think that, because you are a muppet.
As Heist adroitly pointed out, it's not skin colour, it's the fact anyone is shadowing you at 3am.
I used to be *somewhat* active in the Perth nightclub scene and dodginess was never far away - skin colour tended to be at the bottom of the list of motivations.
i've no idea where to start
at the moment i suspect because it's internal discipline and not criminal proceedings
which is an interesting thing.
after all, when i relentlessly pummel somebody without provocation i don't benefit from "internal discipline"
... but, at the moment it's just an assumption.
Last edited by heist; 02-04-2012 at 03:28 PM.
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
Not true. If you're drinking about 1 bottle of spirits per day and in reasonable good health, withdrawl symptoms are very uncomfortable but not life threatening (hot & cold sweats & flushes, itchiness, agitation, shaking, hearing sounds that are not there, insomnia, cramps, cravings etc. for about 48 hrs). More than 1 bottle of spirits/day or not in good health then ceasing alcohol combined with diazepam (valium) to control withdrawl symptoms would be recommended. But if you are at that level a medically supervised withdrawl is most appropriate as death or brain damage from DTs is a real possibility.
As far as alcoholism goes, and I'm sure other addictions are similar, there are two parts, physical & mental. The physical aspect of alcoholism is the phenomenom of craving, which sets in after the alcoholic has one drink, and the body demands more. In fact the more alcohol drunk, the stronger the cravings - this has been proven in that in the metabolic pathway of ethanol breakdown alcoholics have less of the enzyme to process acetone (one of the intermediates) than normal people. Thus, acetone builds up in the system, and it has been proven that the acetone is responsible for the craving. Thus, the more alcohol drunk, the more acetone builds up and the stronger the craving for more alcohol.
The mental aspect is that even when an alcoholic has a full understanding of the phenomenon of craving and the serious consequences of drinking (to finances, relationships, health, etc.), there will come a time when even though 100% sober, the decision is made to have that first drink. This is the fucked up part of the disease, that it always fools the rational part of the mind into thinking that "this time" the results of drinking will be different.
Last edited by frisky; 02-04-2012 at 03:40 PM.
Kick! Peter Van Hoesen (Time To Express, Berlin) pres. by FMP
Sat 26 Jan 2013 at The Bakery part of the Fringe World Festival
Tix from Now Baking only $28
Kick! - 8-Dec-2012 at Velvet Lounge with David Pantino, Mathias Wichmann, PJ Stokes and Sully & Size
Quickmix in the key of F-minor
Filter 01 Opening Set 11/08/2012 - Deep Techno 100-124bpm (73 mins 95 MB)
2012-and-a-half - a techno selection (23-07-2012)
"The best solution to high oil prices is high prices" - OECD boss Angel Gurria 3/06/08
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." - Kenneth Boulding