░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
North Africa is where the diggers were sent to fight the fascists.
I think he was inferring the officer was a fascist or nazi.
Look up Tobruk, World War Two, Rats of.
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can."
what flavour was the guard?
He wasn't chocolate was he?
Aryan-ripple
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can."
Don't have a problem with the content, just the way it's delivered with excessive waffling. People who try to argue their point of view succinctly and without going off on 5 million different tangents tend to get my attention and what they say is taken into serious consideration., People who do the opposite tend to be ignored by me. Make of that what you will.
Waffen-SS Cream Commotion
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can."
For the most part, I agree. The problem is, when you ask those questions, you'll get the stock standard responses of "the government is giving them lots of money and I had to work for mine! My grandparents had to pay their way here bla bla" And.... Well.... There are elements of that that does have some kind of truth to it, but as you said, it was only recently they had their land stolen from them.
1 thing I was told was that the land belongs to nobody.... It was only until after I realized- if the land belongs to nobody, how can the crown claim it and sell it off? This is our system and the way our world operates now, so sadly, we do have to attempt to adjust to it and I think we'd be better off attempting to accommodate that in some way.
The thing is, I can accept those kinds of comments, there is validity to them.... But I think it's also a bit sad compassion seems to be lacking and this whole idea of "they do it to themselves" crap keeps popping up. They lost the war, so its their fault because wars were always fought and that's just the way humans have settled things, again, as harsh as this comment is, it does somewhat ring true. I just still think we can show a bit more compassion and try and listen more than we actually do.
I don't know enough about the issue tbh, but cheers for the input
I always find this one a lot harder to argue against than all the "we give them all this money and stuff but one of them called me a white cunt when I wouldn't give them a cigarette so I hate them all and they deserve it" bullshit that I always hear, because the whole essence of it has some element of truth - basically "we invaded and we won, what of it" instead of "we're so NICE, why do they keep being so MEAN back to us"
pairs quite well with the "are we the baddies?" theme that I sometimes think about though
Last edited by c_avdas; 27-03-2012 at 11:34 PM.
Fault kind of implies wrong doing, and war does not define who is right.
A reason i hear from my mum a bit when deamonising natives is the group-attacks on one or two people just going about their lives. This might be a product of the anger and torment their families have transmitted to them in these past generations over what occurred with the invasion. The problem is our generations are so removed from that event, nobody alive today actually witnessed it, so there's a disconnect between that anger and our role as the 'white man'. But still, why should i have to face the anger when i myself have done nothing wrong? I havn't been mobbed myself, but even when im riding past a few aboriginals i'll often hear a loud crack after im about 40m away, as if they're banging something down.
But is it right to feel resentment towards the individual for being made that way? Society seems to say yes, hence prisons and war. The enlightened that doesn't want to be tied down to the physical reality says no.
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
In Chilliwack, this guy stands by the lights at the intersections. A different approach!
![]()
because you are in the single most privileged position in the world outside of being the living steve jobbs, and empathy for the extremely disadvantaged position you're intelligent enough to recognise the 'others' are in would dictate that you are capable of sucking it up?
sumdae i be big and u be sowry
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/west...-1226311840212
More evidence of excessive violence, evidence tampering and witness intimidation.
IF PEOPLE DIDN'T MAKE EYE CONTACT THEY WOULD NOT BE FORCED TO DO IT /copwife
but three police inquiries found no wrongdoing by police
you can't argue with that
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
I would like an extra one just to be sure. Nothing like more sample size to give you credible data.
Its likes shoplifting and interrogating yourself afterwards.
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can."
repeatedly abused and deprived of liberty and though it was without cause, the police did nothing wrong.
which is interesting - cops exercising the full limit of their powers without cause, does not violate policy.
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
everyone should have a quicklink to record video or sound on their phone if stopped by the cops. try not to bring attention to it. don't lie to police about it either. it may be illegal (not sure really) but if something goes down it can only help you (assuming you're the victim).
ishhhh
Yes its illegal to record a conversation without the other parties knowledge.
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can."
if it's illegal to cover my ass and have something to back up my claims against a police officer that abuses their power. so be it. there is such a thing as trial by media.
ishhhh
Indeed, but the attrition of this over a long period does tend to change my thoughts from 'what was that' to 'why do they keep doing that -_-'
My guess? Cause im white. Though you are right, being white i do suffer a lot less at the hands of racist people than if i was another skin color.
Would appreciate it
Video games are bad for kids. They make them more violent and rots the imagination ;D
srsly though care to elaborate on 'stolen goods'? You mean land?
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
I have heard recording video is not equally illegal as is audio? so what about then recording as a video, but just using the audio as the recording device/camera is in your pocket?
Or having the camera replace a button on your shirt, as we often see on ACA/TT with their 'undercover' reports
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
Yeah its not so much the recording but what you do with it afterwards.
The law differs state to state.
You can almost certainly not use a phone or other telecommunications device to do it in any state.
Telecommunications act of 1975 and Listening devices act of 1985 are most Relevent I think
eg
4 Use of listening devices
(1) A person shall not use, or cause to be used, a listening device—
(a) to listen to or to record a private conversation to which the person is not a party; or
(b) to record a private conversation to which the person is a party.
Excepting:
4.3(b)
(i) the recording of the conversation is considered by that principal party, on reasonable grounds, to be necessary for the protection of that principal party’s lawful interests; or
or
6.2
(ii) with the consent of each principal party to the conversation;
So ZD is on to something. If its protection of your lawful interests, which I would say any conversation with a law enforcement officer most certainly is, record away.
“Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can."
Did you find anything on video footage? Needless to say i should rig up some kind of button-push concealed system, just in case.
Or just pretend to turn my mp3 player on pause and hit the record button
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
http://www.edowa.org.au/files/articl..._activity..pdf
This is relevant
'Furthermore, it might be suggested that an activity that takes place on public lands such as State forests or public roads could not be expected by a reasonable person to occur in private, without more'
'Any person may make an emergency use of an optical surveillance device to observe a private activity without the consent of any of the parties to the activity if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the circumstances are so serious and the matter of such urgency that the use of the device is in the public interest.'
The public interest
There is a wide public interest in the exclusio of evidence illegally obtained. There may be a balancing act to be undertaken to determine which public interest will prevail. For the purpose of Part 5 the use of optical surveillance devices is in the public interest if it is in the interests of national security, public safety, the economic well-being of Australia, the protection of public health and morals, and the protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens.33
This list is not exhaustive and may include other interests
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
danny duberstein's good at two things, that's math and fuckin'
So motion granted to raise the topic of Bennie to the Police thread.
Question - I can't recall who said it and I can't be fucked going back but do you really believe drug addiction is akin to mental illness ??
Of all the 'drugs' out there - the only drug that cannot be 'cold turkeyed' is alcohol. Go figure!
you'll have to define mental illness first (cue ts clusterfuck #14)
i think it's attractive to try frame it as such in order to get away from it being an "evil, selfish action".. but i doubt the categorisation properly fits, or even matters.
what does matter is what's a reasonable response to people who need/want help - some addictions may benefit from the same treatments as some mental illnesses? i really don't know.
what we can be certain of, is that addiction should not be treated as a crime. it's not a crime. it's a physiological state.
Last edited by heist; 30-03-2012 at 01:28 PM.
blacker than the blackest black
times infinity
Ok from the mouth of my friend to TS to which I don't feel the need to defend but it has been interesting looking it up.
In my headspace I believe its true (also depends on how far down the rabbit hole you are in relation to your 'addiction'.)
But let Wikipedia say what it will:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_turkey
Excerpt from Wiki: The supposed disadvantages related to the abuse of drugs such as alcohol, benzodiazepines, and heroin are unbearable withdrawal symptoms from the total absence, which may cause tremendous stress on the heart and blood vessels (and, in a worst case scenario, possible stroke or heart failure).[citation needed] Sudden withdrawal from drugs such as alcohol, benzodiazepines and barbiturates can be extremely dangerous, leading to potentially fatal seizures. In long-term alcoholics, going cold turkey can cause life-threatening delirium tremens and thus is not an appropriate method for breaking an alcohol addiction.[1]
Oh, well, if you believe its true, it must be. Sorry for doubting. Why did you put addiction in quote marks?
That doesnt back up your case that alcohol is the only drug that cannot be quit cold turkey.But let Wikipedia say what it will:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_turkey
Excerpt from Wiki: The supposed disadvantages related to the abuse of drugs such as alcohol, benzodiazepines, and heroin are unbearable withdrawal symptoms from the total absence, which may cause tremendous stress on the heart and blood vessels (and, in a worst case scenario, possible stroke or heart failure).[citation needed] Sudden withdrawal from drugs such as alcohol, benzodiazepines and barbiturates can be extremely dangerous, leading to potentially fatal seizures. In long-term alcoholics, going cold turkey can cause life-threatening delirium tremens and thus is not an appropriate method for breaking an alcohol addiction.[1]